Elder Law Articles
Newest Articles
- New Attorney Catherine E. Malesky Joins the Elder Law Center (8/25/10)
- Proposed Rules Signed Implementing the Deficit Reduction Act Concerning Medicaid Assistance for Long-Term Care (8/25/10)
Article Archive
- Health Reform Law's Pre-Existing Condition Plan Kicks In (7/16/10)
- Court Again Rules That Part D Recipients Must Repay Mistaken Refunds (6/24/10)
- How Risky Is Buying a Limited-Duration Long-Term Care Insurance Policy? (6/8/10)
- Social Security Adds New Online Medicare Application (5/20/10)
- Steps to Take in Advance of Death or Disability (4/29/10)
- Investigative Report Questions Five-Star Rating System for Nursing Homes (4/28/10)
- Health Reform: What Changes Are in Store for the Elderly? (4/8/10)
- Demise of Estate Tax Could Have Serious Consequences for Spouses (3/2/10)
- Social Security Calculator Now Available to Delayed Retirees (2/23/10)
- Things To Remember At Tax Time (2/5/10)
- Congress Lets Estate Tax Expire, But May Act Retroactively (1/12/10)
- Pre-Paid Funeral Plans: Buyer Beware (1/6/10)
- End Of Year Tax Planning Considerations (12/8/09)
- Bank Pays Price for Refusing to Honor Request Made Under a Power of Attorney (12/8/09)
- No Change In Medicaid Spousal Impoverishment Standards for 2010 (11/12/09)
- Switching Medicare Plans If You Move (10/28/09)
- IRS Issues Long-Term Care Premium Deductibility Limits for 2010 (10/19/09)
- New Web Site Promotes Senior Volunteer Opportunities (8/28/09)
- SSA Agrees to Stop Suspending Benefits Based on Existence of Arrest Warrant (8/26/09)
- Useful Financial, Retirement and Personal Calculators Available on the Web (7/30/09)
- Getting Cash From a Life Insurance Policy If You Are Terminally Ill (7/27/09)
- Accounting for Gifts and Loans to Children in Your Estate Plan (6/23/09)
- Requiring Adult Children to Pay for Aging Parents (6/23/09)
- You May Be Able to Claim Social Security Benefits Now and Claim More Later (6/23/09)
- Don't Fall for the 'Certified Copy of Your Deed' Swindle (6/15/09)
- Be Aware Of The Dangers Of Joint Accounts (6/1/09)
- Nearly Two-Thirds Face Risky Retirement Due to Long-Term Care Costs (5/19/09)
- Financial Downturn Coupled With Changing Estate Tax Rules Mean It's Time to Review Your Estate Plan (4/20/09)
- What The Stimulus Bill Means For The Elderly (3/6/09)
- Do You Have The Right Fiduciary? (2/24/09)
- Retirement Home Can Force Resident to Move to Higher Level of Care (2/18/09)
- New Tax Break Helps Surviving Spouse (4/3/08)
- 10 Million Boomers Will Develop Alzheimer's, Report Predicts (3/21/08)
- Why Not Just Use an Off-the-Shelf Power of Attorney Form? (2/28/08)
- Preventing A Will Contest (1/18/08)
- Why Do Married Men Claim Social Security Benefits So Early? (11/6/07)
- New Medicare Premiums (10/5/07)
- What is Required of an Executor? (8/20/07)
- Should You Sign a Nursing Home Admission Agreement? (7/3/07)
- Charitable Gift Annuities (6/4/07)
- How to Choose a Nursing Home (4/10/07)
- Medicaid Recovery of Home Catches Many Families by Surprise (1/5/07)
- Coordinating Medicare and Employer Coverage (12/26/06)
- When Should You Take Your Social Security Retirement Benefits? (10/6/06)
- How to Reduce Long-Term Care Insurance Costs (8/1/06)
Retirement Home Can Force Resident to Move to Higher Level of Care
Last Updated: 2/18/09
A federal court has ruled that a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) can force one of its residents to move from her private apartment to an assisted living unit.
Sally Herriot, 90, is a resident of Channing House, a CCRC in Palo Alto, California, that provides three levels of care -- independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing. Since moving to the facility with her now-deceased husband in 1991, Ms. Herriot has lived in a spacious independent living apartment. After Ms. Herriott returned from a hospital stay in 2006, Channing House determined that it was necessary to transfer her from her apartment to a much smaller, hospital-like assisted-living unit where she could be served by a trained nursing staff. Ms. Herriot, her family and her physician objected to the transfer, arguing that she is able to remain in her apartment with the help of round-the-clock private aides she had hired. Channing House rejected this arrangement.
Ms. Herriot subsequently filed suit in federal court, alleging that Channing House had discriminated against her based on her disabilities by refusing to accept her accommodation of hiring private aides. (See "Retirement Home Resident Fights Move to Increased Level of Care," ElderLawAnswers, 3/3/2007.)
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California now rules that Channing House has a duty to provide Ms. Herriot with medical care based on her level of need, and that it cannot delegate that duty to private help hired by Ms. Herriot. The court finds that Channing House would be violating its legal obligations by accepting Ms. Herriot's plan to allow her to remain in her apartment. Herriot v. House (U.S. Distr. Ct., N.D. Cal., No. C 06-6323 JF (RS), Jan. 29, 2009).